Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent S.A. et al, No. 6:15-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 26, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant ALE USA Inc.’s (“ALE”) Motion for construction of the terms “adapted” and “physically connect.” (Doc. No. 298.) Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC (“Chrimar”) filed a response. (Doc. No. 309.) BACKGROUND The Court previously held that the preambles of claims 31 and 67 of U.S . Patent No . 8,115,012 (“the ’012 Patent”) to be limiting, which contain the terms “adapted” and “adapting,” respectively. (6:13-cv-00880 (Doc. No.