Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent S.A. et al, No. 6:15-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 3, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is: (1) Defendant Alcatel-Lucent Enterprises USA, Inc. (“ALE”) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for A New Trial (Doc. No. 378); and (2) Plaintiffs ’ Chrimar Systems, Inc. d/b/a CMS Technologies and Chrimar Holding Company LLC (“Chrimar” or “Plaintiffs” ) Motion f or Judgment as a Matter of Law on ALE’s IEEE -related Equitable Defenses and Counterclaims (Doc. No. 379 ). The Motions have been fully briefed. For the reasons stated below, Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and Motion for a New Trial (Doc.