Chrimar Systems, Inc. et al v. Alcatel-Lucent S.A. et al, No. 6:15-cv-00163 (E.D. Tex. July 26, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant ALE USA Inc.’s (“ALE”) Motion to Modify Final Judgment (Doc. No. 451). Plaintiffs Chrimar Systems, Inc. and Chrimar Holding Company, LLC (“Chrimar”) filed a response (Doc. No. 452), to which ALE filed a reply (Doc. No. 454), and Chrimar filed a sur-reply (Doc. No. 456). For the reasons stated herein, ALE’s Motion (Doc. No. 451) is DENIED. BACKGROUND On March 9, 2015, Plaintiffs Chrimar filed the instant action against ALE, alleging infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.