Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:13-cv-00448 (E.D. Tex. May 29, 2015)

Granted in Part
IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00448, Dkt. No. 510
Decided
May 29, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
***REVERSED. SEE USCA-FEDERAL CIRCUIT ORDER, Document No. 537***ORDER denying 495 Sealed Motion for Stay
Length
49 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are (1) the Motion To Stay Litigation Pending Covered Business Method Review filed by Defendant Apple, Inc. (Apple) (Dkt. No. 546 in 6:13- CV-447, hereinafter Apple Mot ion) and; (2) the Renewed Motion to Stay Litigation Pending Covered Business Method Review filed by HTC America, Inc., HTC Corporation, Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Telecommunications America, LLC ’s (collectively, Samsung)1 (Dkt. No. 495 in 6:13-CV-448, hereinafter Samsung Motion).

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case