Smartflash LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:13-cv-00448 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2015)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the Court are Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. Nos. 271 & 272; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 322) and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 390; 6:13CV448; Doc. No. 436) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered Defendants’ Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Partial Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 415, 6:13CV448, Doc. No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error