Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:13-cv-00448 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00448, Dkt. No. 417
Decided
December 23, 2014
Judge
See opinion
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting-in-part and denying-in-part 329 Opposed SEALED MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION TO EXCLUDE ROBERT MILLS EXPERT OPINION TESTIMONY PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULES OF EVIDENCE 403 AND 702 filed by Samsung Electronics Co…
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Exclude Robert Mills Expert Opinion Testimony (6:13CV447, Doc. No 279; 6:13CV448, Doc. No 329) and Expert Opinion Testimony Related to Surveys (6:13CV447, Doc. No 280; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 330) Pursuant To Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 702.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Motions to Exclude Robert Mills Opinion are GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART, and the Motions to Exclude Opinion Testimony Related to Surveys are DENIED.