Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 6:13-cv-00448 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 26, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00448, Dkt. No. 467
Decided
January 26, 2015
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court ADOPTS the above claim construction for the patents-in-suit
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion resolves an additional claim construction dispute in United States Patent Numbers: (1) 7,334,720; (2) 7,942,317; (3) 8,033,458; (4) 8,061,598; (5) 8,118,221; and (6) 8,336,772. For the reasons discussed below, the Court resolves the dispute as stated. BACKGROUND On November 14, 2014, Smartflash filed a Motion to Enforce Compliance with O2 Micro , or in the Alternative, to Resolve Manufactured Claim Construction Disputes that Defendants Intend to Argue to the Jury (6:13CV447, Doc. No 317; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 363).