Smartflash LLC et al v. Apple Inc, et al, No. 6:13-cv-00447 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2015)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Before the C ourt are Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for S ummary Judgment Regarding No Willful Infringement and No Indirect Infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 267; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 318) and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447. Doc. No. 389; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 435) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered the Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding No Willful Infringement and No Indirect Infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error