Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Apple Inc, et al, No. 6:13-cv-00447 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 13, 2015)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00447, Dkt. No. 483
Decided
February 13, 2015
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the C ourt are Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for S ummary Judgment Regarding No Willful Infringement and No Indirect Infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No. 267; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 318) and the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (6:13CV447. Doc. No. 389; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 435) recommending that the Motions be denied. Having considered the Objections to the Report and Recommendation Regarding Apple’s and Defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment Regarding No Willful Infringement and No Indirect Infringement (6:13CV447, Doc. No.