Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Apple Inc, et al, No. 6:13-cv-00447 (E.D. Tex. July 8, 2014)

Denied
IPR / PTAB
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00447, Dkt. No. 175
Decided
July 8, 2014
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION and ORDER DENYING 121 SEALED MOTION DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STAY LITIGATION PENDING COVERED BUSINESS METHOD REVIEW OF U.S. PATENT NOS. 7,334,720; 7,942,317; 8,033,458; 8,061,598; 8,118,221; AND 8,336,772 BY THE UNITED ST…
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Apple, Inc.’s Motion to Stay Pending Covered Business Method Review (Doc. No. 121). For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Smartflash LLC and Smartflash Technologies Limited filed this action against Apple, Inc., Robot Entertainment, Inc., KingIsle Entertainment, Inc., and Game Circus LLC alleging infringement of the following patents: U.S. Patent No. 7,334,720; U.S . Patent No. 7,942,317; U.S. Patent No. 8,033,458; U.S. Patent No. 8,061,598; U.S. Patent No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case