Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Apple Inc, et al, No. 6:13-cv-00447 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2014)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00447, Dkt. No. 374
Decided
December 23, 2014
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
in accordance with this Order and shall resubmit them within 15 days
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Defendants’ Motions to Exclude Robert Mills Expert Opinion Testimony (6:13CV447, Doc. No 279; 6:13CV448, Doc. No 329) and Expert Opinion Testimony Related to Surveys (6:13CV447, Doc. No 280; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 330) Pursuant To Federal Rules of Evidence 403 and 702.1 For the reasons set forth below, the Motions to Exclude Robert Mills Opinion are GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART, and the Motions to Exclude Opinion Testimony Related to Surveys are DENIED.