Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Smartflash LLC et al v. Apple Inc, et al, No. 6:13-cv-00447 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 26, 2015)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:13-cv-00447, Dkt. No. 432
Decided
January 26, 2015
Judge
K. Nicole Mitchell, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. The Court ADOPTS the claim construction for the patents-in-suit
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion resolves an additional claim construction dispute in United States Patent Numbers: (1) 7,334,720; (2) 7,942,317; (3) 8,033,458; (4) 8,061,598; (5) 8,118,221; and (6) 8,336,772. For the reasons discussed below, the Court resolves the dispute as stated. BACKGROUND On November 14, 2014, Smartflash filed a Motion to Enforce Compliance with O2 Micro , or in the Alternative, to Resolve Manufactured Claim Construction Disputes that Defendants Intend to Argue to the Jury (6:13CV447, Doc. No 317; 6:13CV448, Doc. No. 363).