Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. May 21, 2008)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00222, Dkt. No. 460
Decided
May 21, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION construing an additional term the parties put in issue during the summary judgment briefing in this case. The Court's claim interpretations are set forth in Appendix B. Claims with disputed terms in bold are …
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION REEDHYCALOG UK, LTD. and GRANT PRIDECO, INC. Plaintiffs vs. BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS INC., HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC., and U.S. SYNTHETIC CORPORATION Defendants § § § § § CASE NO. 6:06 CV 222 § PATENT CASE § § § § § § § SUPPLEMENTAL MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes an additional term the parties put in issue during the summary judgment briefing in this case.