ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 10, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

This Memorandum Opinion construes the terms in U.S. Patent Nos. 6,861,098 (“the ‘098 Patent”); 6,861,137 (“the ‘137 patent”); 6,878,447 (“the ‘447 patent”); and 6,601,662 (“the ‘662 patent”). Also befor e the Court is Def endants’ Joint Mot ion for Summary J udgment of Indefiniteness (Docket No. 123), which the Court DENIES. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs ReedHycalog UK, Ltd and Grant Prideco, Inc.