ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 12, 2007)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS TYLER DIVISION REEDHYCALOG UK, LTD. and GRANT PRIDECO, INC. Plaintiffs vs. BAKER HUGHES OILFIELD OPERATIONS INC., HALLIBURTON ENERGY SERVICES INC., and U.S. SYNTHETIC CORPORATION Defendants § § § § § CASE NO. 6:06 CV 222 § PATENT CASE § § § § § § § MEMORANDUM OPINION This Memorandum Opinion construes the terms in United States Patent Nos. 6,298,930 (the “‘930 Patent”); 6,443,249 (the “‘’249 Patent”); 6,460,631 (the “‘631 Patent”); and 7,000,715 (the “‘715 Patent”).