Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. et al v. Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc et al, No. 6:06-cv-00222 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 27, 2008)

Granted in Part
Discovery Sealing / Protective Order
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division
Case No.
No. 6:06-cv-00222, Dkt. No. 354
Decided
March 27, 2008
Judge
Leonard Davis, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 289 Sealed Motion to Compel; denying 290 Sealed Motion to Compel; granting 301 Sealed Patent Motion for Leave to File; granting 304 Sealed Motion for Leave to File; denying 3…
Length
14 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are ReedHycalog UK, Ltd. and Grant Prideco, Inc.’s (collectively, “ReedHycalog”) Motion to Compel (Docket No. 289) , Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations Inc., Haliburton Energy Services Inc., and U.S. Synthe tic Corporation’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Compel (Docket No. 290), Haliburton Energy Services Inc. (“Haliburton”) and U.S. Synthetic Corporation’s (“USS”) Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Answer (Docket No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case