Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.,, No. 4:18-cv-00474 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2020)

Denied
Daubert / Expert Challenges Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:18-cv-00474, Dkt. No. 767
Decided
July 22, 2020
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Exclude Opinions of David B. Johnson, Ph.D. Regarding "HAL System" (Dkt. #459) is hereby DENIED
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Innovation Sciences, LLC’s Motion to Exclude Opinions of David B. Johnson, P h.D. Regarding “HAL System” (Dkt. #459). Having reviewed the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND This is a patent infringement suit brought by Plaintiff Innovation Sciences, LLC against Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Web Services, LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case