Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.,, No. 4:18-cv-00474 (E.D. Tex. July 22, 2020)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:18-cv-00474, Dkt. No. 766
Decided
July 22, 2020
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED that Amazon's Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff's Damages Expert (Dkt. #422) is hereby DENIED
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Amazon’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Plaintiff’s Damages Expert (Dkt. #422). Having reviewed the motion and the relevant pleadings, the Court finds that the motion should be denied. BACKGROUND This is a patent infringement suit brought by Plaintiff I nnovation Sciences, LLC against Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Web Services, LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. (collectively, “Defendants”) (Dkt. #79 at p. 1).