Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.,, No. 4:18-cv-00474 (E.D. Tex. May 24, 2021)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:18-cv-00474, Dkt. No. 954
Decided
May 24, 2021
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER denying 908 Innovation's Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or Alternatively, Rule 59(a) Motion for a New Trial
Length
21 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Innovation’s Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, or Alternatively, Rule 59(a) Motion for a New Trial (Dkt. #908). Having considered the motion and record, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s motion should be DENIED. BACKGROUND Innovation Sciences, LLC (“Innovation”) sued Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, Inc., Amazon Digital Services, LLC, Amazon Web Services, LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc., and Amazon Fulfillment Services, Inc. (collectively, “ Amazon”) for patent infringement (Dkt. #79 at p. 1).