Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Innovation Sciences, LLC v. Amazon.Com, Inc.,, No. 4:18-cv-00474 (E.D. Tex. Sept. 9, 2019)

Claims Construed
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:18-cv-00474, Dkt. No. 229
Decided
September 9, 2019
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
85 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiff Innovation Sciences, LLC’s (“Pla intiff’s” or “VIS’s” or “Innovation’s”)1 Opening Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #119),2 Defendants Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon Digital Services LLC, Amazon Web Services, Inc. (collect ively, “Amazon”), HTC Corporation (“HTC”), Resideo Technologies, Inc. (“Resideo”), an d Vector Security, Inc.’s (“Vector’s”) Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #131 & D kt. #145), Plaintiff’s Reply Claim Construction Brief (Dkt. #144), Defendants’ Sur-Reply Con struction Brief (Dkt. #147-1; see Dkt.