Evicam International, Inc. v. Enforcement Video, LLC, No. 4:16-cv-00105 (E.D. Tex. June 5, 2017)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Evicam International, Inc.’s (“Evicam”) Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Certain Asserted Claims in the ’907 Patent Are Not Invalid over Certain Asserted References (Dkt. #71). After review ing the relevant pleadings, the Court denies Evicam’s motion. BACKGROUND Evicam alleges WatchGuard infringes U.S. Patent Nos. 6,211,907 (the “’907 Patent”) and 6,950,013. For the ’907 Patent, Evicam assert s Claims 3, 8, 13, 18, 19, 22, 24, and 27 (the “Asserted Claims”).