Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Evicam International, Inc. v. Enforcement Video, LLC, No. 4:16-cv-00105 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 8, 2016)

Granted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:16-cv-00105, Dkt. No. 60
Decided
November 8, 2016
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 24 MOTION to Amend/Correct for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions filed by Enforcement Video, LLC. The Court hereby GRANTS WatchGuards Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Contentions (Dkt. #24)
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant Enforcement Video, LLC’s (“WatchGuard”) Motion for Leave to Supplement Invalidity Cont entions (Dkt. #24). Ha ving considered the relevant pleadings and responses, the Court grants WatchGuard’s motion. BACKGROUND Plaintiff Evicam International, Inc. (“Evicam”) filed its complaint against WatchGuard, alleging patent infringement of two United Stat es Patents: U.S. Patent Nos. 6,211,907 (“the ‘907 Patent”) and 6,950,013 (“the ‘013 Pa tent”) (collectively, the “pat ents-in-suit”).