Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Evicam International, Inc. v. Enforcement Video, LLC, No. 4:16-cv-00105 (E.D. Tex. June 5, 2017)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:16-cv-00105, Dkt. No. 153
Decided
June 5, 2017
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - It is therefore ORDERED that Enforcement Video, LLC d/b/a WatchGuard Video's Motion for Summary Judgment Against the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,950,013 (Dkt. 69) is DENIED
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Enforcemen t Video, LLC d/b/a WatchGuard Video’s (“WatchGuard”) Motion for Summary Judgment Against the Asserted Claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,950,013 (Dkt. #69). After consideri ng the relevant pleadings, the Court denies WatchGuard’s motion. BACKGROUND Evicam International, Inc. (“Evicam”) file d its complaint against WatchGuard, alleging patent infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 6,211,907 and 6,950,013 (the “’013 Patent”).