ams Sensors USA Inc. v. Intersil Corporation, No. 4:08-cv-00451 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2016)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUPPLEMENTAL DAMAGES The following are pending before the court: 1. Plaintiff’s motion for permanent injunction (docket entry #518); 2. Response to TAOS’s motion for permanent injunction (docket entry #525); 3. Plaintiff’s reply in support of its motion for permanent injunction (docket entry #530); 4. Intersil Corporation’s sur-reply to Texas Advanced Optoelectronic Solutions, Inc.’s motion for permanent injunction (docket entry #539); and 5.