Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ams Sensors USA Inc. v. Intersil Corporation, No. 4:08-cv-00451 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 4, 2021)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:08-cv-00451, Dkt. No. 745
Decided
March 4, 2021
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting in part and denying in part 714 SEALED MOTION to Strike Expert Opinions of Woodward Yang, Ph.D. and Thomas W. Britven filed by ams Sensors USA Inc
Length
11 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is TAOS’s Motion to Strike Expert Opinions of Woodward Yang, Ph.D., and Thomas W. Britven (Dkt. #714). Having considered the Motion and relevant briefing, the Court finds the Motion should be GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. BACKGROUND I. The First Trial The parties develop and sell ambient light sensors, which are used in electronic devices to adjust screen brightness in response to incident light.