Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

ams Sensors USA Inc. v. Intersil Corporation, No. 4:08-cv-00451 (E.D. Tex. July 25, 2022)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division
Case No.
No. 4:08-cv-00451, Dkt. No. 916
Decided
July 25, 2022
Judge
Amos L. Mazzant, III, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. It is ORDERED Defendant's Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(b) and 59(a) Motions (Dkt. #876) are hereby DENIED
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 52(b) and 59(a) Motions (Dkt. #876). Having considered the motion s and relevant pleadings, the Court finds they should be DENIED. BACKGROUND The facts of this case are fully set out in the Court ’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Dkt. #855) (the “Opinion”), which was entered on December 14, 2021. In the Opinion, the Court found Defendant Renesas Electronics America Inc. f/k/a Intersil Corporation (“Renesas”) liable to Plaintiff AMS Sensors USA Inc.