Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Monterey Research, LLC v. Renesas Electronics Corporation et al, No. 2:24-cv-00238 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 7, 2026)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment Motions in Limine Motion to Strike Non-Infringement
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00238, Dkt. No. 242
Decided
January 7, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 218 MOTION in Limine to Exclude Evidence, Testimony, or Argument Suggesting That Renesas or Denso Had an Affirmative Obligation to Review the Patents in Monterey's Portfolio That Were Not Identified to Renesa…
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The Court held a Pretrial Conference in the above -captioned case on December 23, 2025 regarding pending pretrial motions, motions in limine (“MILs”), and disputed exhibits between Plaintiffs Monterey Research, LLC (“Monterey”) and MR Licensing LLC (“MRL”) (together “Plaintiffs”), and Defendants Renesas Electronics Corp. (“Renesas”), Denso Corp., and Denso International America, Inc. (“Denso”) (together, “Defendants”) (collectively, the “Parties”). (Dkt. Nos.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case