Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Monterey Research, LLC v. Renesas Electronics Corporation et al, No. 2:24-cv-00238 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 3, 2024)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00238, Dkt. No. 62
Decided
December 3, 2024
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 16 MOTION to Dismiss (Motion(s)16 terminated)
Length
13 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants DENSO Corporation and DENSO International America, Inc. (collectively “DENSO”). (Dkt. No. 16.) Having considered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is GRANTED-IN-PART and DENIED-IN-PART. I. BACKGROUND On April 10, 2024, Plaintiff Monterey Research, LLC (“Plaintiff”) filed a patent infringement complaint against Defendants Renesas Electronics Corporation (“Renesas”) and DENSO. (Dkt. No.