Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Monterey Research, LLC v. Renesas Electronics Corporation et al, No. 2:24-cv-00238 (E.D. Tex. Feb. 24, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00238, Dkt. No. 70
Decided
February 24, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER re 27 MOTION to Sever and MOTION to Stay Pending Final Resolution of Manufacturer's Suit filed by Renesas Electronics Corporation. (Motion(s)27 terminated)
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Sever and Stay Pending Final Resolution of Manufacturer’s Suit (the “Motion”) filed by Defendants DENSO Corporation and DENSO International America, Inc. (collectively, “DENSO”) and Defendant Renesas Electronics Corporation (“Renesas”). (Dkt. No. 27.) Having considered the Motion and related briefing, the Court finds that it should be and hereby is DENIED. I.