Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Monterey Research, LLC v. Renesas Electronics Corporation et al, No. 2:24-cv-00238 (E.D. Tex. July 24, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00238, Dkt. No. 121
Decided
July 24, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Memorandum Opinion and Order
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (the “Motion to Dismiss”) filed by Plaintiff Monterey Research, LLC (“Monterey”). (Dkt. No. 78.) Before the Court is also the Opposed Motion to Join or Substitute MR Licensing LLC filed by Defe ndant Renesas Electronics Corporation (“Renesas”) (Dkt. No. 85) and the Opposed Contingent Motion to Join or Substitute MR Licensing LLC filed by Defendants DENSO Corporation and DENSO International America, Inc. (collectively, “DENSO”) (Dkt. No. 87) (collectively, the “Motions to Join”).