Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EireOg Innovations Ltd. v. Cisco Systems Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00224 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2026)

Adopted in Part Report and recommendation adopted with modification
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00224, Dkt. No. 484
Decided
April 17, 2026
Judge
Robert W. Schroeder, III, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 435 Report and Recommendations and 432 Report and Recommendations, (Motion(s)208, 195, 196, 210, 194 terminated)
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

The above-captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Now before the Court are several motions, including (1) Plaintiff EireOg Innovations Ltd.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Plaintiff Is the Sole Owner of the Asserted Patents (Docket No. 196); (2) EireOg’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’ License Defense Based on Certain Agreements (Docket No. 195); (3) EireOg’s Motion Under Rule 44.1 for Determination of Irish La w (Docket No.