EireOg Innovations Ltd. v. Cisco Systems Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00224 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 17, 2026)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
The above-captioned action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Roy S. Payne pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Now before the Court are several motions, including (1) Plaintiff EireOg Innovations Ltd.’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment that Plaintiff Is the Sole Owner of the Asserted Patents (Docket No. 196); (2) EireOg’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Defendants’ License Defense Based on Certain Agreements (Docket No. 195); (3) EireOg’s Motion Under Rule 44.1 for Determination of Irish La w (Docket No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error