Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

EireOg Innovations Ltd. v. Cisco Systems Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00224 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 9, 2026)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:24-cv-00224, Dkt. No. 450
Decided
April 9, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 204 SEALED MOTION TO EXCLUDE IMPROPER OPINIONS OF DR. MICHAEL C. BROGIOLI filed by Palo Alto Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, Cisco Systems Inc.. (Motion(s)204 terminated)
Length
10 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants Cisco Systems, Inc., Fortinet, Inc., International Business Machines Corporation, and Palo Alto Networks, Inc.’s Motion to Exclude Improper Opinions of Dr. Michael C. Brogioli. Dkt. No. 204. The motion is fully briefed . See Dkt. Nos. 259, 294, 323. In the Motion, Defendants seek to exclude Dr. Brogioli’s opinions concerning benefits of the ’777 and Interrupt Patents, both under Daubert and as untimely. They also seek to exclude his opinions on infringement as untimely.