EireOg Innovations Ltd. v. Cisco Systems Inc., No. 2:24-cv-00224 (E.D. Tex. Apr. 7, 2026)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Improper Opinions and Testimony of Mr. Jim Bergman, Plaintiff’s damages expert. Dkt. No. 200. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that Defendant’s Motion should be, and hereby is, DENIED. I. BACKGROUND In the instant Case, EireOg has accused certain products of Cisco and the other Defendants that contain Intel and AMD chips of infringing U.S. Patent Nos. 8,504,777 (“the ’777 patent”), 9,436,626 (“the ’626 patent”) and 9,442,870 (“the ’870 patent”) (together: “asserted patents”).