Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Barco, Inc. et al v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00521 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 10, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00521, Dkt. No. 230
Decided
November 10, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Having considered Defendants’ Objections (Dkt. No. 222) to the Order of the undersigned resolving the Daubert Motion and Motion to Exclude Expert Opinion of William B. Scally (Dkt. No. 221), the Order is hereby amended as follows. In their objections, Defendants argue that it is improper to allow Mr. Scally to rely upon a pre-suit Global License Offer that Plaintiffs sent to Defendants as a means to potentially resolve the alleged patent infringement now being litigated. Id. at 1.