Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Barco, Inc. et al v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00521 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00521, Dkt. No. 219
Decided
October 13, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 112 Sealed Motion to Strike Expert Opinion
Length
7 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Expert Opinion of Michael C. Brogioli , filed by Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. and Yealink Network Technology Co., Ltd. (“Defendants”). Dkt. No. 112. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED as to the first sentence of paragraph 24 and the second sentence of paragraph 184, and otherwise DENIED. I. BACKGROUND On November 14, 2023, Plaintiffs Barco, Inc. and Barco NV (“Plaintiff”) sued Defendants alleging they infringe several of Plaintiff’s Patents. See generally Dkt.