Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Barco, Inc. et al v. Yealink (USA) Network Technology Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00521 (E.D. Tex. Oct. 13, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00521, Dkt. No. 220
Decided
October 13, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 109 Sealed Motion to Strike Dr. Almeroth's Opinions
Length
5 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Dr. Almeroth’s Opinions, filed by Plaintiff. Dkt. No. 109. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED as to Dr. Almeroth’s opinions at paragraphs 114 to 137, and otherwise DENIED. I. APPLICABLE LAW An expert witness may provide opinion testimony if “(a) the expert’s scientific, technical, or other specialized knowledge will help the trier of fact to understand the evidence or to determine a fact in issue; (b) the testimony is based on sufficient facts or data; (c…