Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MyChoice, LLC v. Taiv, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00507 (E.D. Tex. Dec. 1, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00507, Dkt. No. 189
Decided
December 1, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER denying 90 Sealed Motion to Strike
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Strike Portions of Expert Report of Dr. Kevin C. Almeroth Regarding Invalidity filed by Plaintiffs MyChoice, LLC and Barboards, LLC. (Dkt. No. 90). In the motion, Plaintiffs move to strike certain portions of the expert report of Dr. Kevin C. Almeroth, the Defendant ’s technical expert, regarding invalidity (the “Invalidity Report”). Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that these portions rely on “speculative testimony” from two customers.