Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MyChoice, LLC v. Taiv, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00507 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 24, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00507, Dkt. No. 55
Decided
March 24, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER (Motion(s)14 terminated)
Length
12 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Taiv, Inc.’s Motion to Transfer Venue to the District of Massachusetts Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). (Dkt. No. 14). For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. LEGAL STANDARD A federal district court may transfer a case “for the convenience of parties and witnesses” to “any other district or division where it might have been brought.” 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). Section 1404(a)’s threshold inquiry is whether the case could initially have been brought in the proposed transferee forum.