Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

MyChoice, LLC v. Taiv, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00507 (E.D. Tex. Nov. 30, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00507, Dkt. No. 186
Decided
November 30, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER granting in part 92 Sealed Motion
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Opposed Motion to Strike Taiv’s Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(C) Disclosure of Noah Palansky. Dkt. No. 92. The Motion is ripe. See Dkt. Nos. 105, 122. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is granted only in part. I. BACKGROUND Mr. Palansky is Defendant’s CEO. Dkt. No. 92 at 1. Mr. Palansky was originally identified as having knowledge on “the development and operation of the accused Taiv product,” and “Taiv’s financial data” on July 10, 2024. Id . at 2.