Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Empire Technology Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00427 (E.D. Tex. June 19, 2025)

Granted in Part
Summary Judgment Non-Infringement Willfulness
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00427, Dkt. No. 256
Decided
June 19, 2025
Judge
See opinion
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 224 Report and Recommendations, 225 Report and Recommendations. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. No. 99) is DENIED. It is therefore ORDERED that the Motion for …
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

I N THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION EMPIRE TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC, Plaintiff, v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. and SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS AMERICA, INC., Defendants. § § § § § § § § § § § § C IVIL ACTION NO. 2:23-cv-00427-JRG-RSP O RDER Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgment of No Infringement of U.S. Patent No. 8,798,120 (the “Motion for Summary Judgment”). (Dkt. No.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case