Empire Technology Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00427 (E.D. Tex. May 29, 2025)

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Samsung Defendants’ Motion to Strike Plaintiff’s Second Amended Infringement Contentions (“SAIC”). Dkt. No. 92. Samsung argues that the SAIC are untimely and deficient. Id. at 1. For the reasons discussed below, the Court finds that the SAIC are not timely and Plaintiff has not shown good cause to supplement. The Motion is thus GRANTED. A party may request the Court to grant leave to supplement a filing after the deadline in the scheduling order for “good cause.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).