Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Empire Technology Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00427 (E.D. Tex. June 16, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00427, Dkt. No. 242
Decided
June 16, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 217 Report and Recommendations, 101 Sealed Motion, filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., SamsungElectronics America, Inc. (Motion(s)101 terminated)
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (collectively, “Samsung”) previously filed a Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(1) and 12(c) for Lack of Constitutional Standing (the “Motion to Dismiss”). (Dkt. No. 101.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 217), recommending denial of Samsung’s Motion to Dismiss. Samsung has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No.