Patent Case Watch

Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Empire Technology Development LLC v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00427 (E.D. Tex. June 13, 2025)

Granted in Part
Daubert / Expert Challenges Motion to Strike
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00427, Dkt. No. 234
Decided
June 13, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 102 Sealed Motion; denying 146 Sealed Motion
Length
6 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court are Samsung ’s Motion to Strike and Exclude Portions of the Expert Reports of Plaintiff’s Expert Dr. Robert Akl (Dkt. No. 102) and Samsung’s Supplemental Motion to Strike Portions of the Expert Report of Plaintiff’s Expert Dr. Robert Akl for Contradicting the Court’s Claim Construction Order.1 Dkt. No. 146. For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART Dkt. No. 102 and DENIES Dkt. No. 146. I.

Download Opinion (PDF)

Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error

Other documents in this case