Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00352 (E.D. Tex. June 25, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00352, Dkt. No. 356
Decided
June 25, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 353 SEALED MOTION TO RECONSIDER PARTIAL DENIAL OF MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SUPPLEMENT EXPERT REPORTS BASED ON NEWLY PRODUCED DISCOVERY (DKT. 347) filed by Headwater Research LLC. (Motion(s)353 terminated)
Length
3 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion to Reconsider Partial Denial of Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave to Supplement Expert Reports Based on Newly Produced Discovery (Dkt. No. 347) , filed by Plaintiff Headwater Research LLC. Dkt. No. 353. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED.1 I. BACKGROUND On April 8, 2025, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Supplement Expert Reports Based on Newly Produced Discovery. Dkt. No. 195. In it, Plaintiff sought leave to amend the reports of two of its experts—Dr. Wesel and Dr.