Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00352 (E.D. Tex. June 3, 2025)

Denied
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00352, Dkt. No. 299
Decided
June 3, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 164 SEALED MOTION FOR SANCTIONS UNDER FED. R. CIV. P. 37(e)(1) (Motion(s)164 terminated)
Length
4 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Motion for Sanctions Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 37(e)(1), fi led by Defendants Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc . Dkt. No. 164. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Headwater Research was founded in 2008 along with another entity, ItsOn. See generally Dkt. No. 164- 5. Headwater operated as a research and development entity for technology that ItsOn would license and commercialize. See id.