Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00352 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2025)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Defendants Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc previously filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Rule 12(c ) that the Asserted Claims are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 190.) Magistrate Judge Payn e entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 300), recommending denial of Verizon’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Rule 12(c) that the Asserted Claims are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101. 1 Verizon has now filed Objections (Dkt. No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error