Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00352 (E.D. Tex. July 9, 2025)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00352, Dkt. No. 378
Decided
July 9, 2025
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 300 Report and Recommendations re 190 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings, filed by Verizon Corporate Services Group Inc., Cellco Partnership, d/b/a Verizon Wireless, Verizon Communications Inc…
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Defendants Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc previously filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Rule 12(c ) that the Asserted Claims are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 (Dkt. No. 190.) Magistrate Judge Payn e entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 300), recommending denial of Verizon’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings Under Rule 12(c) that the Asserted Claims are Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101. 1 Verizon has now filed Objections (Dkt. No.