Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Verizon Communications Inc. et al, No. 2:23-cv-00352 (E.D. Tex. June 22, 2025)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00352, Dkt. No. 350
Decided
June 22, 2025
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 184 Sealed Motion
Length
17 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is the Daubert Motion and Motion to Strike Secondary Considerations Opinions of Erik de la Iglesia, filed by filed by Defendants Verizon Communications Inc., Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, and Verizon Corporate Services Group, Inc.. Dkt. No. 184. For the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED as to the sections of Mr. de la Iglesia ’s report that rely on Dr. Wesel's carrier -specific appendices regarding each carrier's alleged knowledge of ItsOn, Headwater, and the asserted patents, and otherwise DENIED. I.