Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Robert Bosch, LLC v. Westport Fuel Systems Canada, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00038 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 11, 2026)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00038, Dkt. No. 354
Decided
March 11, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 310 Report and Recommendations, 188 Sealed Motion r Summary Judgement of Non- Infringement, filed by Robert Bosch LLC. (Motion(s)188, 310 terminated)
Length
1 page

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS MARSHALL DIVISION ROBERT BOSCH LLC. Plaintiff, v. W ESTPORT FUEL SYSTEMS CANADA, INC., Defendant. § § § § § § § § § § CASE NO. 2:23-CV-00038-JRG-RSP O RDER Robert Bosch LLC (“Bosch”) previously filed a Motion for Summary Judgement of Non- Infringement (the “Motion”). (Dkt. No. 188.) Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 310), recommending denial of Bosch’s Motion. Bosch has now filed Objections. (Dkt. No. 327).