Robert Bosch, LLC v. Westport Fuel Systems Canada, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00038 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2026)
From the Opinion
The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.
Westport filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Bosch’s Marking Defense (Dkt. No. 189), a nd Bosch filed a cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Damages (Dkt. No. 182). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 309), recommending granting in pa rt Westport’s Motion, and denying Bosch’s Motion. Westport has now filed objections, and a Motion for Clarification (Dkt. No. 316), with Bosch filing a Response (Dkt. No. 324), and their own objection (Dkt. No. 325). The Magistrate Judge issued an Order (Dkt. No.
Source: govinfo.gov USCOURTS collection · retrieved July 23, 2026 · Report an error