Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Robert Bosch, LLC v. Westport Fuel Systems Canada, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00038 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 12, 2026)

Adopted Report and recommendation (or magistrate's order) adopted
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00038, Dkt. No. 351
Decided
March 12, 2026
Judge
Rodney Gilstrap, J.
Document
Order
Docket Entry
ORDER adopting Report and Recommendations for 309 Report and Recommendations, 189 Sealed Motion for Summary Judgment on Boschs Marking Defense filed by Westport Fuel Systems Canada Inc., 182 Sealed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No …
Length
2 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Westport filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on Bosch’s Marking Defense (Dkt. No. 189), a nd Bosch filed a cross Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of No Damages (Dkt. No. 182). Magistrate Judge Payne entered a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. No. 309), recommending granting in pa rt Westport’s Motion, and denying Bosch’s Motion. Westport has now filed objections, and a Motion for Clarification (Dkt. No. 316), with Bosch filing a Response (Dkt. No. 324), and their own objection (Dkt. No. 325). The Magistrate Judge issued an Order (Dkt. No.