Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Robert Bosch, LLC v. Westport Fuel Systems Canada, Inc., No. 2:23-cv-00038 (E.D. Tex. Mar. 2, 2026)

Granted in Part
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:23-cv-00038, Dkt. No. 321
Decided
March 2, 2026
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Memorandum Order
Docket Entry
MEMORANDUM ORDER re 187 OPPOSED SEALED MOTION To Strike Certain Opinions of Dr. Richard W. Klopp filed by Westport Fuel Systems Canada Inc.. (Motion(s)187 terminated)
Length
9 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendant Westport Fuel Systems Canada Inc’s Motion to Strike Certain Opinions of Dr. Richard W. Klopp. Dkt. No. 187. Having considered the Motion, and for the reasons discussed below, the Motion is GRANTED as to the defenses of Obviousness -Type Double Patenting (“ODP”) and enablement/indefiniteness of the “fluid passage” term. The Motion is otherwise DENIED. I. BACKGROUND Bosch has filed a declaratory judgment action against Westport Fuel Systems Canada Inc. for non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos.