Patent opinions from the Eastern District of Texas and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

E.D. Tex.

Headwater Research LLC v. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. et al, No. 2:22-cv-00422 (E.D. Tex. Aug. 2, 2024)

See Opinion Disposition stated in the opinion
Court
U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division
Case No.
No. 2:22-cv-00422, Dkt. No. 399
Decided
August 2, 2024
Judge
Roy S. Payne, M.J.
Document
Report and Recommendation
Docket Entry
SAMSUNGS STANDING DEFENSE filed by HEADWATER RESEARCH LLC. Objections due within 14 days of receipt
Length
15 pages

From the Opinion

The passage below is extracted verbatim from the opening of the document. It has not been editorially summarized — consult the full opinion for the court's complete reasoning.

Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Standing (Dkt. No. 236) , Plaintiff’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment as to Defendant Samsung’s Standing Defense (Dkt. No. 241) , and Defendants’ Second Motion for Sanctions. (Dkt. No. 366) 1. The issue of standing is one for the Court, not the jury. See DDB Techs., L.L.C. v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P., 517 F.3d 1284, 1291 (Fed. Cir. 2008). As such, the Court held an evidentiary hearing on the matter on July 25, 2024 and heard testimony from Dr. Raleigh and argument from both parties.